Certain principles of policy to be followed by the State
included in editionWhat does this mean?
The State's policy should address adequate livelihoods, distribution of resources, concentration of wealth, equal pay, worker protection and children's development. The separate clauses identify different policy aims rather than one automatic cash entitlement.
Policy directions for a fairer society, livelihoods, health, education, justice and public institutions.
Why is this provision here?
The policy framework identifies concrete distributional, livelihood and child-protection priorities rather than leaving welfare as an undefined slogan.
This Article number belongs to the original constitutional framework, but its present wording may include later amendments or substitutions. A provision-specific original Assembly debate has not been verified here. The explanation of function above is editorial inference from the text, not an attributed single motive of the framers. The original draft-making archive is a research resource, not proof of a particular historical reason. The later amendment records linked below document changes affecting this Article; their Bill statements explain those proposals, not necessarily every original clause or the complete present legal outcome.
The explanation of purpose is an editorial reading of the provision. A drafting motive is attributed only where a linked historical source supports it.
Limits, exceptions & reading carefully
Educational summary of the linked source text. Exceptions, provisos, implementing laws and applicable judgments must be read before applying it to a real case.
Read the official constitutional text
Source-page notes · may concern neighbouring Articles
1. Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 7, for cl. (f) (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
Extracted from the Legislative Department’s May 2026 edition. Page footnotes may refer to neighbouring provisions; check their markers in the PDF. Inclusion in this edition does not by itself establish commencement or judicial effect.
